In Praise of Paul: What’s Wrong with Silly?

Paul McCartney Peace Signs Courtesy of Getty Images

With the passings of David Bowie, Glenn Frey, and Jefferson Airplane’s Paul Kantner, 2016 was a particularly rough year for classic rock icons. After a certain point, there’s a tendency to take our most enduring artists somewhat for granted in their lives and only appreciate them when they’re gone. Perhaps, in light of recent sadness, it’s time to appreciate some of them while they’re still with us.

Aside from Bob Dylan, rock music arguably has no greater elder statesman than Paul McCartney. However, whatever respect he gets often feels a bit grudging, especially in contrast to the adulation his former band-mate John Lennon still receives. This is as puzzling as it is unfair, because McCartney is the only member of the “Fab Four” who’s truly had to struggle to live up to the group’s legacy over the long-term.

That doesn’t mean that McCartney should get a pass for the sometimes terrible work he’s done since (or, sometimes, with) The Beatles. His would-be 9/11 anthem “Freedom” is a strong candidate for worst post-Beatles song by any member of the group, and his 80s work could have used a few more collaborations with Elvis Costello and a couple fewer with Michael Jackson. At the same time, a sober assessment of Lennon’s solo work suggests that his post-Beatles adulation hinges on one cathartic album, an ode to Utopianism and a pervasive sense that his death cut short some sort of creative renaissance. McCartney, on the other hand, gets criticized on the basis of preferring catchy over cathartic and having the nerve to get old.

What this view overlooks is that so many of his solo songs, ranging from “Another Day” to the more recent “New,” are not just catchy – they’re effortlessly catchy. Even the Band on the Run album, which was recorded under chaotic circumstances, doesn’t sound forced. That stellar craftsmanship sometimes obscures his artistry, which is a shame and something worth rectifying while he’s still with us. Whether it’s a buried treasure like 1987’s “Once Upon a Long Ago” or a standard like “Maybe I’m Amazed,” there’s nothing wrong with enjoying a good love song – silly or otherwise.

Don Klees

Photo Credit: Paul McCartney by Uriel Sinai/Getty Images

PS. To learn more about Paul McCartney’s collaboration with Elvis Costello, check out our post When a Beatle Wrote with Elvis. And for our reflections on the late, greats David Bowie and Glenn Frey, read What Would Bowie Do? and “Perfection is Not an Accident.”

Other Posts You Might Like

5 comments on “In Praise of Paul: What’s Wrong with Silly?

  1. […] You may also enjoy Don’s article In Praise of Paul: What’s Wrong with Silly? which reflects on the musical contributions of Paul McCartney and why the former Beatle sometimes […]

  2. […] Beatles fans might enjoy several other CultureSonar posts: John Lennon: Guitarist; In Praise of Paul and When a Beatle Wrote with […]

  3. […] And for more coverage of the Beatles, don’t miss With The Beatles, From the Beginning, In Praise of Paul: What’s Wrong with Silly?, and John Lennon: […]

  4. It msy be hard for you to believe, but some of us have seen Paul as tje workhorse of the Beatles, and have actually preferred his solo artistry to that of John, George or, Ringo.

    As onr of those in that camp, I find this article patently ridiculous.

  5. I own EVERYTHING the Beatles, McCartney recorded, including European releases, so I have long known the genius of Paul McCartney.
    Sure, he’s older now, may not reach his high standard of vocals, but he once DID.
    I’ve even criticized his current voice ( at live concerts I’ve attended), but damn, no one can touch his melodies, bass lines, compositions!

Leave a Reply (and please be kind!)